Shortcomings of peer review in biomedical journals

نویسندگان

  • Elizabeth Wager
  • Tom Jefferson
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Peer review for biomedical publications: we can improve the system

The lack of formal training programs for peer reviewers places the scientific quality of biomedical publications at risk, as the introduction of 'hidden' bias may not be easily recognized by the reader. The exponential increase in the number of manuscripts submitted for publication worldwide, estimated in the millions annually, overburdens the capability of available qualified referees. Indeed,...

متن کامل

Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities

BACKGROUND Peer review is the major method used by biomedical journals for making the decision of publishing an article. This cross-sectional survey assesses views concerning the review system of biomedical journals among academics globally. METHODS A total of 28,009 biomedical academics from high-ranking universities listed by the 2009 Times Higher Education Quacquarelli Symonds (THE-QS) Wor...

متن کامل

Writing for Research Publications

Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals [1] (Consensus standards by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for editors, authors, and publishers of biomedical journals.) Review Criteria for Research Reports [2] (Task Force report that presents and explains standards for research articles-for reviewers and authors.) Publish, Not Perish: Art & Craft of...

متن کامل

Do Croatian open access journals support ethical research? Content analysis of instructions to authors

INTRODUCTION The aim of our study was to investigate the extent to which Instructions to authors of the Croatian open access (OA) journals are addressing ethical issues. Do biomedical journals differ from the journals from other disciplines in that respect? Our hypothesis was that biomedical journals maintain much higher publication ethics standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study looked at...

متن کامل

Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things that Make a Big Difference

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. pISSN 1011-8934 eISSN 1598-6357 Peer Review in Scholarly Biomedical Journals: a Few Things t...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Learned Publishing

دوره 14  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2001